Presentation "Using the results of the assessment procedures of the oge, oge for making managerial decisions in order to improve the quality of education." Gia results Presentation of the results of the OGE for education management

Results of the OGE 2014 According to the results of the unified state exam, 101 graduates of the 9th grade (100%) admitted to the exams and received certificates of basic general education. Seven graduates of the 9th grade - 7% (2013 - 7%) received certificates with honors: The quantitative analysis of graduates in 2014 is as follows: Students of the 9th grade passed the unified state exam in two forms: (99%), 2) in the form of GVE - 1 person. (1%). According to the results of 2014 in the form of the OGE, the level of education: - in the Russian language%, the quality of education - 92%; the average score for the school is 4.46 (2013 - the level of education is 100%, the quality of education is 72%, the average score is 4.0). - in mathematics it was %, the quality of education - 41%, the average score for the school - 3.6 (2013 - the level of education - 100%, the quality of education - 85.7%, the average score for the school - 4.10). Passed exams again in 2014 in mathematics - 4 people, which is 4%.

Class Number of students in the class who took the exam in the form of the OGE Number of students in the class who took the exam in the form of the GVE Subject Russian - 9B23-15(65%)7(31%)1(4%)- 9V27-5(19)%)16(59%)6(22%)- 9G26-15(58%)10(38%) 1(38%)- Total (55%)38(38%)8(7%)-

Approved the annual estimate-36 (35%) Did not confirm the annual estimate-65 (65%) Above the annual estimate-63 (63%) Below the annual estimate-2 (2%) Confirmed the annual estimate-36 (35%) Did not confirm the annual estimate -65 (65%) Above the annual estimate-63 (63%) Below the annual estimate-2 (2%)

Class Number of students in the class form OGE Passed the exam in the form of the OGE Passed the exam in the form of the GVE Subjects Mathematics Algebra Geometry Graded: "5" "4" "3" "2" "5" "4" "3" "2" 9A ( 24%)18(69%)1(4%)-6(24%)18(72%)1(4%) 9B23 -1(4%)8(38%)14(61%)-1(17 %)8(35%)14(61%)- 9V (41%)14(52%)2(7%)-11(41%)14(61%)2(7%) 9G26 -3(12% )12(46%)10(38%)1(4%)3(12%)12(46%)10(38%)1(4%) Total (4%)37(37%)56(55% )4(4%) 37(37%)56(55%)4(4%)

According to the results in the form of the OGE, the level of education in 2014 is as follows: -mathematics was %, the quality of education - 41%, the average score for the school - 3.6 - (2013 - the level of education - 100%, the quality of education - 85.7%, the average score - 4.1). - in the Russian language %, the quality of education - 92%; average score - 4.46 - (2013 - level of education - 100%, quality of education - 72%, average score - 4.0). Of the subjects of choice in the form of the OGE, this academic year, students were offered 8 subjects: history, biology, social studies, physics, computer science, literature, geography, foreign language. The choice of students was distributed as follows: social science was passed by 7 (7%) ninth-graders, biology - 5 (5%), physics - 4 (4%), history - 3 (3%), computer science - 4 (4%), geography - 4 (4%), The least demanded subject was history, the share of those who chose this subject was only 3%. OGE in history passed 3 people. The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 100%, the average score is 4.0. OGE in biology was passed by 5 people. The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 60%, the average score is 3.6. OGE in geography was passed by 4 people. The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 100%, the average score is 4.75. OGE in Informatics was passed by 4 people. The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 50%, the average score is 3.5. The OGE in social studies was passed by 7 people. The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 86%, the average score is 3.43. OGE in physics was taken by 4 people. The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 50%, the average score is 3.5. OGE on English language rented 1 person The level of education is 100%, the quality of education is 100%, the average score is 5. The exams were repeated in mathematics - 4 people, which is 4% of the number of 9th grade graduates who passed the state final certification in the form of the OGE.

Analysis of the results of the OGE of elective subjects (physics, computer science, geography, biology, chemistry, history, social studies, English) 2014 The results of the OGE in physics: passed by 4 people, received an assessment in the subject: 9A - 1 ("4" - 1) ; 9B - 2 ("4" - 1; "3" -1); 9B - 1 ("3" -1), the average score for the school is 3.5 (the average score for the district is 3.6). The level of education is 100%, the quality of education is 50%. The results of the OGE in informatics: passed by 4 people, received an assessment in the subject: 9A - 1 ("3" -1); 9B - 2 ("4" -2); 9B - 1 ("3" -1), the percentage of quality is 50%, the average score for the school is 3.5 (the average score for the district is 4.1). The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 50%. The results of the OGE in geography: passed by 4 people, received an assessment in the subject: 9B - 1 ("5" -1); 9G - 3 ("5" -2; "4" -1), the average score for the school is 4.8 (the average score for the district is 4.0). The level of training - 100%, to the quality of training - 100%. The results of the OGE in biology: passed by 5 people, received an assessment in the subject: 9B - 2 ("4" -1; "3" -1); 9B - 2 ("4" -1; "3" -1); 9G - 1 ("4" -1), the average score for the school is 3.6 (the average score for the district is 3.5). The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 60%. The results of the OGE in chemistry: passed by 4 people, received an assessment in the subject: 9B - 3 ("4" -3); 9B - 1 ("5" -1), the average score for the school is 4.3 (the average score for the district is 4.2). The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 100%. OGE results in history: passed by 3 people, received an assessment in the subject: 9A - 1 ("4" -1); 9B - 1 ("4" -1); 9G - 1 ("4" -1), the average score for the school is 4 (the average score for the district is 4). The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 100%. The results of the OGE in social studies: passed by 7 people, received an assessment in the subject: 9A - 2 ("4" -2); 9B - 1 ("3" -1); 9G - 4 ("5" -1; "4" -3), the average score for the school is 4.0 (the average score for the district is 3.5). The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 86%. The results of the OGE in English: passed by 1 person, received a grade in the subject: 9A–1 (“4”-1), the average score for the school is 5.0 (the average score for the district is 3.9). The level of training is 100%, the quality of training is 100%.

OGE in physics grade 9A: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (100%). Grade 9B: passed 2 people: percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (50%). Grade 9: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 0 (0%). ____________________________________________________________________ Total in physics: 4 people took the test: percentage of knowledge quality -2 (50%). OGE in Informatics Grade 9A: passed by 1 person: the percentage of knowledge quality is 0 (0%). Grade 9B: passed 2 people: percentage of knowledge quality - 2 (100%). Grade 9: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 0 (0%). _____________________________________________________________________ Total in biology: 4 people took the exams: the percentage of knowledge quality was 2 (50%). OGE in geography grade 9B: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (100%). Grade 9: passed 3 people: percentage of knowledge quality - 3 (100%). ________________________________________________________________ Total in geography: 4 people took the exam: percentage of knowledge quality -4 (100%).

OGE in history grade 9A: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (100%). Grade 9B: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (100%). Grade 9: passed 3 people: percentage of knowledge quality - 3 (100%). _____________________________________________________________________ Total for history: 3 people passed: percentage of knowledge quality -3 (100%). OGE in Biology Grade 9B: passed by 2 people: the percentage of knowledge quality is 1 (50%). Grade 9: passed 2 people: the percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (50%). Grade 9: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (100%). _____________________________________________________________________ Total in biology: 5 people took the exams: the percentage of knowledge quality was 3 (60%). OGE in chemistry grade 9B: passed by 4 people: percentage of knowledge quality - 4 (100%). Grade 9: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (100%). ____________________________________________________________________ Total in chemistry: 5 people took the test: percentage of knowledge quality -5 (100%).

OGE in social studies grade 9A: passed by 2 people: percentage of knowledge quality - 2 (100%). Grade 9: passed 4 people: the percentage of knowledge quality - 4 (100%). Grade 9B: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 0 (0%). ________________________________________________________________________ Total in social studies: 7 people passed: the percentage of knowledge quality was 6 (86%). OGE in English grade 9A: passed 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (100%). ________________________________________________________________________ Total in English: passed by 1 person: percentage of knowledge quality - 1 (100%).

Public observers

The number of graduates who did not receive a certificate after the end of the MAIN period - 5 people. (2017 - 6 people)

Results of Stobalniki

105 graduates of 2018 received 220 points or more after 3 exams

Quality of preparation of medalists

USE RESULTS ON SUBJECTS FOR THE LAST 3 YEARS.

Percentage of graduates of the current year who received the number of points on the Unified State Examination below the minimum

The average test score is above the regional average of the previous year in 9 (2017 -5) subjects

The average test score is lower than the district indicator of the previous year in 2 (2017 - 6) subjects

Rating of educational organizations based on the results of the Unified State Examination 2018

List of OOs with an average of the top three results

The most popular OGE subjects

The average score of participants in the state final certification of graduates who have mastered the programs of basic general education

Knowledge quality

"TRANSFER"

Rating of educational organizations based on the results of the OGE 2017

The best schools by average score in 4 subjects in the Moscow region

Description of the presentation on individual slides:

1 slide

Description of the slide:

Results and analysis of the results of the GIA in mathematics for graduates of grades 9 and 11 in 2016 Actual tasks and directions of activity for the organization of high-quality preparation of students in grades 9 and 11 for exams. Prepared by: teacher of mathematics MKOU "PSOSH" Shitikova N.V.

2 slide

Description of the slide:

The state final certification of graduates is an integral part of the educational process, its natural completion. It allows you to identify the general level of intellectual development of students, their ability to operate with acquired knowledge, skills and abilities. The structure and content of the examination work meet the goal of building differentiated education in a modern school, which includes two tasks: 1) the formation of basic mathematical training in all students, which is the functional basis of general education; 2) the creation of conditions conducive to obtaining advanced level training, the second part is aimed at identifying the most prepared part of the graduates that make up the potential of students high school

3 slide

Description of the slide:

The GIA of primary school graduates was conducted in two forms 1) in the form of the main state exam - OGE - using control and measuring materials, which are sets of tasks of a standardized form 2) in the form of a state final exam - GVE - written and oral exams using texts, topics , tasks. In our district, 105 people passed compulsory exams in the Russian language and mathematics in the form of the OGE, and 6 people in the form of the GVE. To conduct the GIA on the basis of the schools of the district, the work of 4 points was organized.

4 slide

Description of the slide:

5 slide

Description of the slide:

Brief meaningful analysis of the OGE in mathematics Compared to last year, the results decreased: average score - from 17.4 to 15.19 average mark - from 3.7 to 3.57 - quality of students' knowledge - from 61.8% to 50.5% With tasks of the basic level of complexity of the first part of the examination paper in mathematics 6.7% (7 people) of graduates were completely able to cope (last year - 13%) Only 18% (19 people) of ninth graders partially completed the second part of the examination work (last year - 25%) 32 no one scored the maximum possible points

6 slide

Description of the slide:

Reasons for the decline in results lack of motivation; low abilities; pedagogical neglect of students; lack of proper parental control; deterioration in the health of the younger generation, including the negative impact bad habits on the health, mental activity of students; insufficient tracking by the teacher of falling topics in the subject. The system of total cheating that has been developing over the years reduces the level of responsibility in children, they stop preparing for exams. It is also necessary to note the adolescence of ninth-graders (according to statistics, at this age there is a reassessment of values, children are focused on communication, and not on study). The lack of a system of labor education in the modern school, various sources of ready-made and accessible information lead to the fact that children do not know how and no longer want to work, make any effort, there is no motivation for learning.

7 slide

Description of the slide:

When performing the tasks of the second part of the work, most of the errors were not of a computational nature. Students gave incomplete justifications for their actions, omitted the steps of the solution, incorrectly recorded the answer, which led to a decrease in points for completing the task according to the criteria presented. The results of the second part of the work revealed a problem associated with the need for special training of some schoolchildren to complete assignments high level complexity, the use of tasks of different levels of complexity in the learning process on all topics of the mathematics course. Errors when performing the second part of the GIA

8 slide

Description of the slide:

In 2016, the USE in mathematics was conducted at two levels. The exam participant had the right to independently choose any of the levels, or both levels, depending on their educational needs, as well as the prospects for continuing education. For admission to higher educational institutions in the specialty, where mathematics is one of the entrance requirements, the applicant had to fulfill the examination requirements at the profile level. For admission to specialties not related to mathematics, as well as to obtain a certificate of secondary education, it is enough to fulfill the attestation requirements at the basic level. The results of the exam in mathematics in the 2015-2016 academic year

9 slide

Description of the slide:

10 slide

Description of the slide:

Brief meaningful analysis of the Unified State Examination in Mathematics According to the results of the exam in mathematics at the profile level, tasks with a short answer were performed significantly better than tasks with a detailed answer. High success rates were demonstrated in solving the first six tasks of the basic level, which indicates the formation of basic mathematical competencies among the participants in the exam for the mathematics course of the main and secondary general education schools.

11 slide

Description of the slide:

MAIN CONCLUSIONS Particular attention should be paid to improving the computational skills of students, using for this an oral account, a system of individual tasks. When preparing for the GIA, systematically include tasks for repeating basic actions, such as: calculating the values ​​of expressions, converting algebraic expressions, actions with fractions, actions with powers, solving linear equations, inequalities and their systems. When repeating the geometry course, systematically check students' knowledge of the basic formulas, formulations of theorems, properties of geometric objects, which are often used in solving problems. When repeating mathematics, special attention should be focused on achieving awareness of students' knowledge, on the ability to apply the knowledge gained in practical activities, on the ability to analyze, compare, and draw a conclusion.

12 slide

Description of the slide:

It is necessary to pay attention to the formation of knowledge bases during training and not to force forward progress by skipping or curtailing the stage of introducing new concepts and methods. It is important to use visual aids to ensure understanding, for example: a coordinate line when solving inequalities and systems of inequalities, a graph of a quadratic function when solving square inequalities, graphs when explaining the meaning of the concepts of an equation with two variables, solving a system of equations with two variables. It is important to constantly teach self-control techniques. For example, when factoring a polynomial, it is useful to teach students to perform the reverse operation for verification; when plotting a function graph, control yourself based on the known properties of the graph. In other words, preparation for the exam is carried out not in the course of a massive solution of options - analogues of examination papers, but in the course of the entire educational process and consists in the formation of some common learning activities contributing to a more effective assimilation of the studied issues. MAIN CONCLUSIONS

13 slide

Description of the slide:

At the stage of preparation for the exam, work with students should be differentiated. The teacher should set for each student the goal that he can realize in accordance with the level of his training, while it is possible to rely on the self-esteem and aspirations of each student. Under the conditions of a two-level exam, in order to organize the educational process, educational organizations should take into account the presence of two groups of students with different prospects for professional activity and forming different educational needs. Work programs in mathematics educational organizations should reflect the emerging trend. It is necessary to fill the work programs with practice-oriented tasks, to build a system for studying practical, vital mathematics in all school years. This includes elements of financial and statistical literacy, the ability to make decisions based on calculations, self-control skills by assessing the possible values ​​​​of physical quantities based on life experience and studying other school subjects. MAIN CONCLUSIONS

MOU "Average comprehensive school No. 1, Ershov, Saratov Region"

• Using the Results
• assessment procedures (OGE, USE)
• for making managerial decisions
• to improve
• quality of education

• G.N. Lepekhin,
• Director of the Municipal Educational Institution "Secondary School No. 1 of Ershov"

• 2016
• Ershov

• ISO-9000 principle:
• "Fact-Based Decision Making"

• obtain information about the level and quality of training of graduates of general educational institutions;
• assess the degree of mastery of secondary school graduates by the content of subjects tested at the exam, reflected in the mandatory minimum content and requirements for the level of training of graduates;
• determine directions for improving the educational process and educational and methodological support of educational subjects;
• highlight individual levels in the preparation of students (basic, advanced and high);
• receive information about the state of educational achievements of students in academic subjects;
• determine the typology of typical mistakes made by graduates;
• compare the results of the GIA by years, etc.

• GIA results
• and their interpretation
• provide an opportunity:

• the number of those who took the exam in the subject - an indicator of the demand for the subject among graduates of the OO;
• average score on a 100-point scale, results on a 5-point scale - an indicator of learning;
• the solvability of each task of the work is an indicator of the degree of assimilation of a particular topic;
• the solvability of the tasks of part C is an indicator of the quality of in-depth training, etc.

• 33,(3)%
• positive dynamics

• 33,(3)%
• indifference to therapy

• Tyurubaeva Kamila:
• the best result in the district at the exam in biology;
• federal medal "For Special Achievements in Education";
• student of the Saratov State Medical University. IN AND. Razumovsky (budget).

• It is impossible to demand the same results from schools operating in different conditions.
• You cannot demand the same results from schools with different resources and development opportunities.

• Principles
• objective assessment of school performance

• “The quality of education is the ratio of the goal and the result, despite the fact that they are set only promptly, predicted in the zone of potential development of the student”
• Mark Potashnik

• openness and availability of information about organizations engaged in educational activities;
• the comfort of the conditions in which educational activities are conducted;
• friendliness, courtesy, competence of employees;
• satisfaction of service recipients with the quality of educational activities of organizations
• Indicators detailing the named criteria were approved
• Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of December 05, 2014 N 1547 .

• The quality of education reflects the readiness and capabilities of the individual
• to be in demand in the labor market,
• be successful in your professional life
• and capable of self-actualization.

• Russian Deputy Prime Minister Olga Golodets:
• “Higher education is necessary only for a third of the population of the country, the remaining 65 percent do not need it”

• 1. Increasing the professional level of teachers through the system of intra-school methodological work
• 2. Improving the school system for monitoring educational and extracurricular achievements
• 3. cardinal change school work on interaction with the parent community
• 4. Improving the content and methods of working with students:
• Implementation of the Program of work with separate categories students (gifted children, children with disabilities, children with learning difficulties).
• Development of tutor support for students, building individual educational trajectories
• 5. Changes in approaches to the organization of pre-profile and profile training of students.

• Problems solved at the school level

• The instability of the teaching staff due to low level wages compared to other city schools (due to the low class size, which takes its roots from the learning conditions in the old school building)
• Territorial remoteness of rural branches from the basic school located in the city, in connection with this - differences in the socio-economic conditions of education, difficulties in building a school-wide management system in order to improve the quality of education
• Lack of specialists in the subject in the branch of Yuzhny settlement
• An objectively large number of children with a low level of intellectual development in the village of Yuzhny
• For technical reasons (including the lack of modern computers and equipment for remote interaction, low Internet speed) it is impossible to organize systematic methodological work with teachers and consulting work with children in rural branches.
• Insufficiently developed infrastructure of the basic school compared to a competing school located in the same microdistrict with ours: lack of a gym, an assembly hall, a licensed medical office. As a result, more socially successful parents, and therefore children, pass by our school.

• The number of students who scored at least 10 points in the sum of 3 subjects of the OGE (in a 5-point system) and did not receive "twos" at the same time
• The number of students in grade 4 who scored at least 11 points in the sum of 3 subjects of the VPR and did not receive "twos" at the same time
• The number of students who scored at least 160 points in the sum of 3 USE subjects

• Participation in independent diagnostic procedures (for example, VPR, regional monitoring or diagnostic work, etc.):
• Frequency of participation in VPR per year
• Frequency of participation in regional monitoring activities per year
• Frequency of participation in regional diagnostic work per year
• Number of VPR participants
• Number of participants in regional monitoring work
• Number of participants in regional diagnostic work
• Availability of internal regulations that provide conditions for conducting objective diagnostic and monitoring procedures
• Availability of the NGO website with information:
• - rules for admission to the OO
• - the number and occupancy of classes
• - the results of the State final certification (in grades 9 and 11)
• - the results of the participation of NGOs in independent procedures for assessing the quality of education
• Availability on the site of the NGO of the opportunity to leave a public review
• Number of self-examination reports published on the NGO website

• - Area per contingent
• - Computerized OO
• - Internet access
• - Availability of a swimming pool
• - Availability of a gym
• - Presence of a stadium
• - Accessibility of the educational environment for students with disabilities
• - Share of teachers with pedagogical or university education
• - Share of teachers with the highest qualification category
• - The share of teachers who have passed independent certification with high results
• - The presence of competitive selection for admission to any classes

• MOU "Secondary School No. 1 of Ershov"

• Branch of the Municipal Educational Institution "Secondary School No. 1 of Ershov"
• in with. Semeno-Poltavka

• Branch of the Municipal Educational Institution "Secondary School No. 1 of Ershov"
• in Yuzhny

• Number of winners of the regional stage of the High School of Education
• Number of winners of the regional stage of the High School of Education
• Number of winners of the final stage of the High School of Education
• Number of winners of the final stage of the High School of Education
• Number of subjects of the regional stage of the Higher School of Education
• The number of subjects of the final stage of the High School

• Number of students taking additional OGEs
• Number of students taking additional exams
• The number of graduates who continued their studies in the vocational education system

• The number of students in the 4th grade who scored at least 11 points in the sum of 3 subjects of the VPR and did not receive "twos" at the same time - 16 people (50%)
• The number of students in grade 9 who scored at least 10 points in the sum of 3 subjects of the OGE (according to a 5-point system) and did not receive "twos" at the same time - 27 people (90%)
• The number of students who scored at least 160 points in the sum of 3 USE subjects is 8 people (23%) of the number of students who took 3 or more exams.

• Student and Teacher Success
• in 2015-2016 academic year

• Kokoreva Yulia Yurievna,
• teacher of Russian language and literature, winner of the municipal competition "Teacher of the Year - 2016",
• winner (2nd place) of the regional competition "Teacher of the Year-2016"

• Voronina Anna Sergeevna, senior counselor,
• 1st place in the municipal competition of counselors
• "To the heights of excellence"

• Kulkova
• Lilia Alexandrovna,
• head counselor at the branch
• in with. Semeno-Poltavka,
• 2nd place in municipal
• counselor competition
• "To the heights of excellence"

• Mikhalkin
• Oksana Konstantinovna,
• class teacher of grade 7a, - 2nd place
• in the municipal competition
• "The coolest cool-2016"

• Kibitkina
• Olga Gennadievna,
• class teacher 6b class - winner
• municipal competition
• "The coolest cool-2015"